← Back to browse

SalesSeek

by Tim HampsonLaunched 2012-11via Nathan Latka Podcast
MRR$20k/mo
Growthenterprise direct sales
Time to PMF3 years
Pricingsubscription
Built in3 years
The Spark

Tim Hampson founded SalesSeek in late 2012 after extensive experience at major software companies including IBM, Sybase, and several successful startups. He identified a gap in the market: while enterprise CRM tools like Salesforce and marketing automation platforms like Eloqua dominated, there was no integrated solution optimized specifically for smaller to medium-sized companies. SalesSeek was born to fill this gap—combining CRM and marketing automation functionality in a cloud-based, easy-to-use platform priced for growth-stage companies rather than enterprises.

Building the First Version

For the first two to three years, the SalesSeek team remained heads-down in product development with virtually no revenue. To survive this extended build period, Hampson and his co-founders self-funded the company, essentially paying themselves ramen salaries to keep development moving. This bootstrap approach, while slow, gave them complete control and eliminated fundraising distractions. After a few years of development and the first few customer wins, they raised their first institutional funding from UK VC Sussex Place Ventures. In total, SalesSeek has raised approximately "just under, I think, four and a half, five million" in capital.

Finding the First Customers

Once the product launched, SalesSeek pursued an enterprise direct sales model. Hampson emphasized the importance of getting customers to input their own data immediately—particularly contact data—to show quick value. The company leveraged integrations with LinkedIn and UK Companies House to make data import frictionless. Sales cycles typically closed within four to eight calls, with most conducted remotely via WebEx or Skype, though the team met local clients in person when possible. The land-and-expand strategy proved effective: early single-user signups from enterprises would expand to 80-100+ seat deployments as the champion gained internal adoption.

What Worked (and What Didn't)

SalesSeek's core insight was that enterprise customers had sophisticated requirements and willingness to pay for them. While their lowest tier started at $20/user/month, enterprise tiers reached $80-100/user/month—a 4-5x price difference justified by advanced features only larger organizations needed. The company achieved over 100% net revenue retention by combining low churn among large customers with expansion revenue as those customers grew. They proved willing to spend up to nine months of customer revenue on acquisition—a long CAC runway justified by three-year average customer lifetimes. The main challenge remained visibility in an enormous CRM market dominated by HubSpot and Salesforce, though Hampson argued HubSpot was a comparable integrated suite rather than a true free competitor.

Where They Are Now

By late 2018, SalesSeek had 150 customers with an average of 80-100 seats per customer, yielding approximately $240K+ in monthly recurring revenue based on their disclosed minimum numbers. The 20-person team—primarily sales and marketing in the UK, with distributed support and European developers—was growing year-over-year, having doubled the previous year and approaching doubling again. Their stretch goal was to reach profitability and break $1M ARR, with monthly burn in the tens of thousands. Hampson believed consistent 15%+ month-over-month growth was the real trigger for future funding, not absolute revenue size, positioning SalesSeek as a disciplined, profitable-focused alternative to venture-backed scaling.

Similar Companies

247.ai

$25.0M/mo

247.ai, founded by PV Cannon in 2000, is an AI-powered customer service automation platform serving over 150 enterprise customers with $300M+ in ARR. The company raised only $20M from Sequoia (2003) and bootstrap, achieving 10% net profit margins while maintaining a 12-month CAC payback period and 100% net revenue retention. Despite a security breach setback around 2018, 247.ai has recovered and recently achieved 20% new revenue booking growth in their best quarter.

iCIMS

$13.3M/mo

iCIMS is a bootstrapped SaaS provider founded in 1999 that dominates the talent acquisition software market as the #2 player, serving 3,500 enterprise customers with an average monthly spend of $4,000. The company exited 2017 with $160M ARR and is targeting 25%+ annual growth while maintaining profitability, recently acquiring Text Recruit to expand into candidate messaging and recruitment advertising.

Madwire

$10.0M/mo

Madwire is a comprehensive SaaS platform for small businesses (1-100 employees) that combines CRM, payments, invoicing, billing, e-commerce, and multi-channel marketing tools in a single platform. Founded in 2009, the company has grown to $120M ARR serving 20,000 customers with an average revenue per user of $500/month, while maintaining strong unit economics ($3,000-$4,000 CAC with 3-month payback) and recently turning profitable with a focus on reaching 15-20% EBITDA margins. The company is exploring an IPO within 12-18 months without having raised substantial capital beyond an initial $7.5M.

SwiftPage

$7.0M/mo

SwiftPage is a CRM and marketing automation platform founded in 2001 that targets small businesses. Under CEO John Oshel's leadership since 2012, the company scaled from 60,000 customers with $26.2M revenue in 2015 to 84,000 customers today with an estimated ARR of $36M+, maintaining 1.5% monthly logo churn and a 6-7 month payback period with a sub-$500 CAC.

Brandwatch

$5.0M/mo

Brandwatch is an enterprise SaaS social intelligence platform founded in August 2007 by Giles Palmer that crawls 80 million websites and aggregates social media feeds to provide brands with real-time insights about conversations mentioning them and competitors. Operating profitably at scale with 1,500 enterprise customers paying an average ACV of $30,000, the company generated over $60M ARR in 2017 and grew approximately 30% year-over-year while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital deployment.

Related Guides