← Back to browse

PatSnap

by Jeffrey TiongLaunched 2007via The SaaS Podcast
See all SaaS companies using cold email
Growthcold email
Time to PMF2-3 years to first version, then additional 2+ years to product stability
Pricingsubscription
Built in2-3 years
The Spark

Jeffrey Tiong was fresh out of college in Singapore when he stumbled upon a frustrating problem. During an internship at a medical device startup in Philadelphia, he spent countless hours researching patents and intellectual property—work that was tedious, expensive, and time-consuming. Existing tools cost around $100,000 per year, while free government databases lacked basic features. He realized there was a massive gap in the market. Patent databases contained over 300 years of accumulated human innovation, disclosed by inventors as part of a deal with governments. Yet these databases were written by lawyers in impenetrable language. "If we can decode this data source and make it as easy as possible, even a university student can understand how a technology works," he thought, "that will be really great."

Building the First Version

Back in Singapore after graduation, Tiong applied for a startup grant from his alma mater, National University of Singapore, and received around $40,000. He spent roughly one-third on servers—cloud infrastructure didn't exist yet—and the rest on hiring developers. But the money ran out quickly. To keep the lights on, Tiong and his team took on consulting projects and applied for additional grants. They also had to acquire patent datasets from governments around the world and spend months cleaning and normalizing the data. Two to three years passed before they shipped their first crude version. During this time, Tiong did minimal customer validation. He pitched the idea to a few prospects, who said it sounded great but wanted to see a working product. He was essentially building in the dark.

Finding the First Customers

When the product finally launched in late 2009, Tiong's first sale came a few months later—to his university library. "I just hustled and talked to the librarian," he recalled. "There was a very nice kind lady [who] just gave us a shot." It wasn't a glamorous start, but it was proof of concept. In 2012, Tiong partnered with someone experienced in inside sales. Together, they built a team in London that cold-called prospects in the US and Europe, delivering web demos. The response was surprisingly positive, especially from R&D departments. These teams had never seen a user-friendly tool for technology intelligence, and they were willing to take a chance on a scrappy startup.

What Worked (and What Didn't)

Interestingly, Tiong's original target market was IP attorneys and lawyers—they had the deepest pockets and the most critical need. But they also had the highest standards for data coverage, accuracy, and completeness. PatSnap's early product couldn't meet those demands. Instead, R&D departments became the unexpected goldmine. They had better purchasing power than Tiong anticipated, fewer technical requirements, and they loved the product's ease of use. R&D budgets globally total $2 trillion annually—a market so massive that even incremental improvements created enormous value.

But early customers quickly discovered the product was fragile. During demos, Tiong had to carefully choreograph every interaction to avoid crashes. "We actually had a very curated demo journey," he admitted. "We highlight our product features like some visualization analysis [and] use certain keywords that we know will work." After launch, customer complaints poured in. The team simultaneously had to acquire customers, keep them happy, and stabilize a broken product. It took another 2+ years of intense work before PatSnap became reliable enough for mainstream use. Tiong had to make a painful choice: avoid selling to customer segments that were poor fits for early-stage software, and focus on early adopters within R&D who were willing to tolerate imperfection.

Where They Are Now

By 2020, PatSnap had grown to 8,000 customers and 800 employees, with clients including Walt Disney, Tesla, and NASA. The company had raised over $51 million in funding. Inside sales remained the primary growth engine for the first 6-7 years. Inbound marketing didn't launch until around 2016-2017. Tiong reflected on the journey with hard-won wisdom: building took longer than it should have, he lacked confidence as a young founder, and he made leadership mistakes that demoralized his team. But he also learned the power of authenticity, self-awareness, and surrounding himself with co-founders and team members who could share the burden. "With yourself alone, you are nothing," he concluded. The biggest challenge now was scaling beyond his founding team's "zero to one" DNA while retaining the entrepreneurial spirit that built the company.

Why It Worked
  • The founder identified a genuine personal pain point and invested sufficient time (4-5+ years) to build a stable, market-ready product before aggressively scaling sales, avoiding premature commercialization of immature software.
  • Leveraging an existing trusted relationship (alma mater) for the first customer provided social proof and validation that reduced friction for subsequent enterprise sales conversations.
  • Shifting from cold email to an inside-sales model with direct human engagement proved more effective for enterprise SaaS, suggesting the product required explanation and trust-building that automation couldn't provide.
  • Establishing a dedicated inside-sales team in a different geography (London) than the primary target market (US/Europe) enabled 24/7 coverage and local market credibility without requiring the founder to be omnipresent.
How to Replicate
  • 1.Spend 2-3 years building an MVP and additional 2+ years stabilizing the product before launching aggressive sales efforts, resisting pressure to monetize before product-market fit is genuinely achieved.
  • 2.Identify and approach your first 5-10 customers through personal networks or alma mater connections where you have credibility, using them as case studies and references for enterprise outreach.
  • 3.Build an inside-sales team equipped to conduct live phone calls and web-based product demonstrations rather than relying on self-serve or email-only channels, especially for complex B2B SaaS.
  • 4.Establish your sales operations hub in a location that provides geographic coverage and local credibility for your target markets, even if it differs from your product development headquarters.

Similar Companies

247.ai

$25.0M/mo

247.ai, founded by PV Cannon in 2000, is an AI-powered customer service automation platform serving over 150 enterprise customers with $300M+ in ARR. The company raised only $20M from Sequoia (2003) and bootstrap, achieving 10% net profit margins while maintaining a 12-month CAC payback period and 100% net revenue retention. Despite a security breach setback around 2018, 247.ai has recovered and recently achieved 20% new revenue booking growth in their best quarter.

iCIMS

$13.3M/mo

iCIMS is a bootstrapped SaaS provider founded in 1999 that dominates the talent acquisition software market as the #2 player, serving 3,500 enterprise customers with an average monthly spend of $4,000. The company exited 2017 with $160M ARR and is targeting 25%+ annual growth while maintaining profitability, recently acquiring Text Recruit to expand into candidate messaging and recruitment advertising.

Zoom

$12.0M/mo

Zoom is a freemium SaaS video conferencing platform founded by Eric Yuan in July 2011 after he left Cisco to build a next-generation collaboration solution. The company has grown to 850,000+ paying customers across individual, SMB, and enterprise segments, generating over $12M in monthly recurring revenue with approximately 100% year-over-year growth. Rather than focusing on customer stickiness or aggressive growth targets, Zoom emphasizes customer happiness and organic word-of-mouth acquisition, which has proven highly effective in driving viral adoption.

Madwire

$10.0M/mo

Madwire is a comprehensive SaaS platform for small businesses (1-100 employees) that combines CRM, payments, invoicing, billing, e-commerce, and multi-channel marketing tools in a single platform. Founded in 2009, the company has grown to $120M ARR serving 20,000 customers with an average revenue per user of $500/month, while maintaining strong unit economics ($3,000-$4,000 CAC with 3-month payback) and recently turning profitable with a focus on reaching 15-20% EBITDA margins. The company is exploring an IPO within 12-18 months without having raised substantial capital beyond an initial $7.5M.

SwiftPage

$7.0M/mo

SwiftPage is a CRM and marketing automation platform founded in 2001 that targets small businesses. Under CEO John Oshel's leadership since 2012, the company scaled from 60,000 customers with $26.2M revenue in 2015 to 84,000 customers today with an estimated ARR of $36M+, maintaining 1.5% monthly logo churn and a 6-7 month payback period with a sub-$500 CAC.

Related Guides