← Back to browse

MotionThink

by Andrew Chenvia Failory
See all SaaS companies using other
Growthother
Pricingsubscription
Built in6 months
The Spark

Andrew Chen moved to San Francisco from New York with a clear goal: to start and run his own technology company. After spending a couple of years meeting people in the industry and learning about tech trends, he joined a startup accelerator funded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's venture capital firm, Innovation Endeavors. The program had an unusual structure: founders applied without pre-committed co-founders and participated in a "co-founder dating" process to match up with potential teammates.

Building the First Version

Once teams were formed, Andrew and his co-founders went through a need-finding and design-thinking process to identify a startup idea. They settled on building productivity tools for freelancers. Over the course of six months, the team prototyped many different products, starting with customer interviews. "Almost everyone said finding new clients/customers was a huge pain point; many also said getting paid on time by clients/customers was a pain point," Andrew recalled. They built stubbed-out prototypes in Photoshop and HTML/JavaScript without real data, using them to simulate product ideas and gather feedback from potential users. This design-feedback-iterate loop generated learnings, but also revealed deeper problems.

What Went Wrong

As the team got to know each other through building, fundamental differences emerged. "Differences in opinion among the co-founders also quickly emerged, both in terms of business direction and in terms of what our goals were for doing the startup. These differing views soon became too big to ignore and, eventually, too big to proceed with." After six months, it became clear the founders were not aligned on a shared vision, and they were spending more time debating and arguing than building. "It would take multiple units of discussion for every unit of work output, and in the early days of a startup, that ratio should be the mirror opposite." The company never achieved revenue and had burned through approximately $100,000 in seed funding. Andrew resigned as CEO, and his co-founders tried to continue for another month before unwinding the company entirely.

Key Lessons

Andrew identified the root cause as a structural flaw in the accelerator program itself: requiring solo applicants without pre-formed teams. "This stands in stark contrast to every other major incubator that just about requires your founding team to already be formed – and to have been working together for a long time and, ideally, to already have some demonstrated traction – before you apply." The accelerator program itself failed after just two batches, validating this approach. Andrew's main takeaway: "The #1 reason startups fail is because the founders quit or break up, resulting in startup suicide. This is what happened to us." He emphasized that while business ideas and products will pivot dramatically, people don't change. Therefore, knowing your co-founders well before committing is essential—"it really is like marrying someone."

Why It Worked
  • Accelerator programs that force co-founder matching without prior working relationships inevitably create alignment problems that are difficult to overcome in a startup's critical early months.
  • Co-founder misalignment on foundational motivations and philosophy is more destructive than market problems or product issues, because it prevents the team from making decisions and taking action efficiently.
  • The pressure to formally launch a company before validating co-founder chemistry locks in relationships prematurely, eliminating the option to part ways gracefully before significant capital is burned.
How to Replicate
  • 1.Before joining an accelerator or formally starting a company, work on side projects with potential co-founders for nights and weekends while keeping your day job—this is low-cost dating that reveals work styles and commitment levels.
  • 2.Have explicit early conversations with potential co-founders about goals, motivations, and values before filing incorporation paperwork or raising capital; use disagreements during informal projects as signals to part ways early.
  • 3.When evaluating whether to commit fully to a startup idea and team, look for a track record of successful collaboration (months of working together) and deep alignment on 'what would have to happen' for each founder to justify leaving their current role.

Similar Companies

247.ai

$25.0M/mo

247.ai, founded by PV Cannon in 2000, is an AI-powered customer service automation platform serving over 150 enterprise customers with $300M+ in ARR. The company raised only $20M from Sequoia (2003) and bootstrap, achieving 10% net profit margins while maintaining a 12-month CAC payback period and 100% net revenue retention. Despite a security breach setback around 2018, 247.ai has recovered and recently achieved 20% new revenue booking growth in their best quarter.

iCIMS

$13.3M/mo

iCIMS is a bootstrapped SaaS provider founded in 1999 that dominates the talent acquisition software market as the #2 player, serving 3,500 enterprise customers with an average monthly spend of $4,000. The company exited 2017 with $160M ARR and is targeting 25%+ annual growth while maintaining profitability, recently acquiring Text Recruit to expand into candidate messaging and recruitment advertising.

Zoom

$12.0M/mo

Zoom is a freemium SaaS video conferencing platform founded by Eric Yuan in July 2011 after he left Cisco to build a next-generation collaboration solution. The company has grown to 850,000+ paying customers across individual, SMB, and enterprise segments, generating over $12M in monthly recurring revenue with approximately 100% year-over-year growth. Rather than focusing on customer stickiness or aggressive growth targets, Zoom emphasizes customer happiness and organic word-of-mouth acquisition, which has proven highly effective in driving viral adoption.

Madwire

$10.0M/mo

Madwire is a comprehensive SaaS platform for small businesses (1-100 employees) that combines CRM, payments, invoicing, billing, e-commerce, and multi-channel marketing tools in a single platform. Founded in 2009, the company has grown to $120M ARR serving 20,000 customers with an average revenue per user of $500/month, while maintaining strong unit economics ($3,000-$4,000 CAC with 3-month payback) and recently turning profitable with a focus on reaching 15-20% EBITDA margins. The company is exploring an IPO within 12-18 months without having raised substantial capital beyond an initial $7.5M.

SwiftPage

$7.0M/mo

SwiftPage is a CRM and marketing automation platform founded in 2001 that targets small businesses. Under CEO John Oshel's leadership since 2012, the company scaled from 60,000 customers with $26.2M revenue in 2015 to 84,000 customers today with an estimated ARR of $36M+, maintaining 1.5% monthly logo churn and a 6-7 month payback period with a sub-$500 CAC.

Related Guides