← Back to browse

Braze

by Bill MagnusonLaunched 2011via Nathan Latka Podcast
MRR$5.0M/mo
Growthenterprise direct sales
Pricingsubscription
The Spark

Bill Magnuson and the Braze team saw a fundamental opportunity in 2011: mobile was transforming how brands communicate with customers, and most companies lacked the technology to engage at scale. They recognized that the app store and global distribution platforms were enabling startups worldwide to scale rapidly, but these businesses needed better tools to maintain customer relationships across multiple channels. This insight sparked the creation of Appboy (later rebranded to Braze), a platform built to be the backbone of customer engagement for consumer-scale enterprises.

Building the First Version

The founders took venture capital from the onset, raising $40M over the first six years as they carefully matched growth to market opportunity. Bill became co-founding CTO and later transitioned to CEO about two years before this interview. The team built Braze as a pure SaaS platform, starting with a focus on mobile-first companies and early digital-first brands that needed to coordinate messaging across channels like mobile push, email, web, and owned channels.

Finding the First Customers

Braze's early customer base was notably global—more global than even their investors expected. The early customers in 2013–2014 were primarily mobile-first and digital-first startups scaling internationally. As the company matured, it shifted focus toward larger enterprise customers, diversifying beyond digital-native companies into traditional Fortune 500 brands. By the time of this interview, the customer base had grown to over 600 clients with average annual contract values (ACVs) of $100k+, spanning multiple verticals and regions.

What Worked (and What Didn't)

Several factors drove success: (1) A strong expansion motion within existing customers. Starting with a single channel or product, Braze would gradually expand to cover all customer communication as clients grew, leading to 10–20x growth from some early customers. This expansion drove net revenue retention of roughly 140%, meaning the company was growing from existing customers nearly as fast as from new ones. (2) A dedicated account management function, added only in the last 2–3 years, significantly improved retention and expansion. (3) Deep internal dogfooding: Braze used its own product for lifecycle communications with prospects, customers, and employees. (4) Disciplined capital allocation. Having raised less capital than competitors in the first five to six years, the company maintained strong unit economics with payback periods between 16 and 24 months depending on customer archetype. Gross revenue churn was around 5–10%, varying by region and customer segment.

Where They Are Now

As of the interview (December 2018), Braze had scaled to $60M ARR ($5M/month run rate), up from $30–35M a year prior, representing ~70% year-over-year growth. The company had raised $170M total (an additional $130M in the prior 18 months alone) and employed roughly 300 people globally. Management anticipated reaching $100M+ ARR within the next year. The company remained profitable in unit economics and was focused on consolidating customer communication across enterprise silos—a trend they were seeing increasingly across all verticals. With a 16–24 month payback period and strong renewal economics, Braze was positioned as a healthy, sustainably growing enterprise SaaS company.

Similar Companies

247.ai

$25.0M/mo

247.ai, founded by PV Cannon in 2000, is an AI-powered customer service automation platform serving over 150 enterprise customers with $300M+ in ARR. The company raised only $20M from Sequoia (2003) and bootstrap, achieving 10% net profit margins while maintaining a 12-month CAC payback period and 100% net revenue retention. Despite a security breach setback around 2018, 247.ai has recovered and recently achieved 20% new revenue booking growth in their best quarter.

Madwire

$10.0M/mo

Madwire is a comprehensive SaaS platform for small businesses (1-100 employees) that combines CRM, payments, invoicing, billing, e-commerce, and multi-channel marketing tools in a single platform. Founded in 2009, the company has grown to $120M ARR serving 20,000 customers with an average revenue per user of $500/month, while maintaining strong unit economics ($3,000-$4,000 CAC with 3-month payback) and recently turning profitable with a focus on reaching 15-20% EBITDA margins. The company is exploring an IPO within 12-18 months without having raised substantial capital beyond an initial $7.5M.

Brandwatch

$5.0M/mo

Brandwatch is an enterprise SaaS social intelligence platform founded in August 2007 by Giles Palmer that crawls 80 million websites and aggregates social media feeds to provide brands with real-time insights about conversations mentioning them and competitors. Operating profitably at scale with 1,500 enterprise customers paying an average ACV of $30,000, the company generated over $60M ARR in 2017 and grew approximately 30% year-over-year while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital deployment.

Jellyvision

$5.0M/mo

Jellyvision evolved from a 1990s gaming company making virtual game show hosts on CD-ROMs into a B2B enterprise SaaS platform called Alex. Since relaunching in 2002, they've built a subscription business helping large employers navigate employee benefits decisions, now serving 1,400 customers representing 18 million employees with a $60M+ ARR, over 100% net revenue retention, and a 51% five-year CAGR—all while remaining largely bootstrapped and cash-flow positive since 2009.

Active Campaign

$4.2M/mo

Active Campaign started in 2003 as an on-premise email marketing solution built by Jason Vanderboom to fund his fine arts degree. After 10 years and 8 employees generating a couple million in revenue, he transitioned to a SaaS model starting at $9/month. The company now has over 60,000 customers generating over $50 million annually and employs 330 people, growing primarily through organic adoption, partnerships, and focus on the SMB market despite pressure to move upmarket.

Related Guides