Oramed Pharmaceuticals
Ndave Kydron came from a business background—a lawyer with an MBA—but his mother was a scientist who had been working on a specific problem for decades: how to deliver insulin orally instead of through injections. In 2006, she approached him with a breakthrough. She had developed technology that could protect insulin from degradation in the stomach and allow it to pass intact into the liver, the organ that naturally regulates insulin secretion. The potential was massive: almost 10% of the population suffers from diabetes, and the shift from injections to oral delivery would fundamentally change patient experience and compliance.
Kydron worked with the medical center's tech transfer office to license the intellectual property out and started the company in 2006. The technology works by using an "anti-enzyme shield" that protects insulin from the digestive enzymes that would normally break it down. Instead of insulin going straight into the bloodstream (as with injections), oral insulin delivery sends it to the liver first, where it can work more physiologically. The core innovation was the protective mechanism—similar to an M&M shell—that keeps the insulin intact through the digestive tract.
Raising capital for a pre-revenue pharmaceutical company was challenging. Traditional venture investors are uncomfortable with the 15-16 year development timeline and $1 billion average cost to bring a drug to market. Kydron made the unconventional decision to take Oramed public on NASDAQ in 2013, seven years after founding. This gave early investors liquidity while the company continued through FDA trials. The strategy worked: in December 2015, a major Chinese pharmaceutical firm became their first major customer through a private placement, investing $12 million in equity and paying $38 million for exclusive licensing rights in China.
The Chinese partnership validated the technology's potential—they valued the company at approximately $1 billion based on the deal structure. However, the public markets were slower to react, possibly due to bias against China-derived investments and low liquidity in the stock. Kydron noted that while the company was trading around $5 per share, the Chinese partner paid $10.50 per share, creating a disconnect. The illiquidity meant larger institutional investors couldn't enter without dramatically moving the stock price. By Kydron's account, the company is roughly "half private"—public in structure but with concentrated ownership limiting trading volume.
As of the interview, Oramed had raised over $100 million in total capital (including the Chinese deal) and maintained approximately $50 million in cash on the balance sheet. The company was proceeding through FDA Phase 3 trials, with a major 90-day trial expected to produce results within 10 months. The Chinese FDA process was expected to move faster. Kydron remained cautiously optimistic but clear-eyed: pharma is binary—either the drug gets approved and becomes a major success, or it fails. There's rarely a middle ground of steady moderate revenue. The company was also developing a pipeline beyond insulin, including GLP-1 analogs for weight loss and leptin treatments, and partnering with major pharmaceutical companies to apply their delivery technology to other drugs.
- •The founder's unique combination of legal/business expertise and access to a mother's decades-long scientific breakthrough created a rare opportunity to commercialize an innovation that traditional channels had not yet developed.
- •By going public early (2013) despite pre-revenue status, Oramed gave early investors an exit while gaining balance sheet resources to sustain a capital-intensive 15+ year pharmaceutical development timeline that venture investors typically avoid.
- •Licensing partnerships with well-capitalized foreign firms (Chinese pharma) proved more viable than traditional VC funding because partners could justify massive upfront payments based on exclusive territorial rights rather than requiring near-term profitability.
- •The founder recognized that pharmaceutical development requires patient capital and long timelines, so he pivoted from traditional fundraising to a hybrid public/partnership model that aligned incentives with stakeholders who could afford to wait for FDA approval.
- 1.If you have deep IP or scientific insights trapped in academic or family networks, formalize relationships with university tech transfer offices to license intellectual property and establish clear ownership before founding the company.
- 2.For capital-intensive businesses with 10+ year development cycles, consider a dual strategy: go public early to provide liquidity and credibility to early investors, then use the public platform to attract strategic partnership deals from larger firms seeking territorial or sector-specific licensing rights.
- 3.Target partnerships with foreign pharmaceutical firms or large corporations in your target market who have balance sheets large enough to pay upfront licensing fees ($10M+) and equity investments; their ability to monetize in their home market justifies payments that pure venture investors cannot justify.
- 4.When traditional institutional capital is unavailable or misaligned with your timeline, structure deals with strategic partners that include both equity stakes and licensing fees tied to specific geographic territories or indications, creating multiple value recognition points.
Similar Companies
GetResponse
$5.0M/moGetResponse is a bootstrapped SaaS platform founded by Simon Grubowski in 1998 with just $200, starting from his parents' attic. The company grew to serve nearly a million users with approximately 100,000 paying customers generating around $5 million in monthly recurring revenue by expanding from email marketing into marketing automation, landing pages, webinars, and CRM tools. Today, with 300 employees across offices in Poland, Boston, Canada, Russia, and Malaysia, GetResponse has achieved 20% year-over-year growth while reducing monthly logo churn to 6% through product improvements and simplified cancellation processes.
QuestionPro
$2.5M/moQuestionPro is a bootstrapped SaaS survey and feedback platform that grew to $30M ARR primarily through strategic acquisitions of smaller companies, buying them at 2x multiples. The company's growth strategy focused on consolidation within the survey/feedback tools market rather than traditional marketing channels.
Servoy
$2.5M/moServoy is a low-code platform-as-a-service founded in 2001 by Jan Elman that enables rapid development of business applications for corporate users and independent software vendors. After 17 years of bootstrapped growth with only $1M in external funding raised in 2008, the company has scaled to over 1,000 customers, $30M ARR, 100 employees, 30% YoY growth, 3% revenue churn, and net revenue retention above 100%. The company maintains healthy unit economics with a 12-14 month customer acquisition payback period and a $1 CAC to $1 ACV ratio.
Hive Blockchain
$2.5M/moHive Blockchain is a digital currency mining company founded by Harry Pochgranti that validates cryptocurrency transactions on blockchain networks, primarily Ethereum. The company went public on the TSX Venture Exchange in September 2017, raising $17 million on day one followed by additional equity raises totaling approximately $200 million Canadian by end of 2017. As of Q1 2018, Hive operates mining facilities in Iceland and Sweden with a $30 million annualized run rate revenue.
LifeWave
$1.7M/moLifeWave is a health technology company founded in 2002 by David Schmidt that sells phototherapy patches to help people improve their health naturally. The company generates $20M/mo in revenue across 80 countries using an independent distributor business model, with their flagship X39 product driving record growth after its 2019 launch.